Melrose Cares: Open Community Dialogue




Click here to report offensive or inappropriate posts.



Return to Website  > Index  > Melrose Cares: A Community Dialogue  > Schools & School Committee  > Re: Question 2
Recent Posts
 
Schools & School Committee
Start a New Topic 
1 2 3
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
View Entire Thread
Pot
Oct 25, 2016 - 7:07PM
Re: Question 2

The question on pot? I will do the same and wait to see the results. The results in Melrose schools is vote yes on question 2. Teachers and staff will not help a child that is behind so that student suffers.

Voted Early!
Oct 26, 2016 - 9:13AM
Re: Question 2

I voted yesterday and voted YES on question #2 and NO on question #4. Thanks to all the posters who provided information and their insight on these issues. You all made some great points on both sides of those issues. By the way - there was a short line to vote early in the Alderman chamber at city hall - seems like people are taking advantage of this opportunity.

Voted Often!
Oct 26, 2016 - 3:15PM
Re: Question 2

...like a Hillary supporter

Care To Explain?
Oct 26, 2016 - 3:19PM
Re: Question 2

Point Made
"DESE is now prioritizing reimbursements to districts during the first year of a tuition increase (the 100 percent reimbursement tier of the 100/25/25/25/25/25 sequence). Districts due reimbursements for later tiers only receive funding as it’s available. For FY 2016 it appears as though funding will be close to sufficient for funding first-year reimbursements (DESE currently projects 95% reimbursement for year one increases), with little to nothing left over for later year reimbursements. This effectively shifts the formula in FY 2016 from 100/25/25/25/25/25 to 95/0/0/0/0/0."

Let's translate that to Melrose. If MV raises it's tuition $1000, in the first year Melrose will get most of that reimbursed. In the following years, Melrose will get none of it reimbursed, meaning a guaranteed additional shortfall of about $200,000.00 every year, and that's just for one $1000 tuition increase.


It isn't just tuition increases, it's ALL tuition. From the Free Press: "A 2010 law requires the state to reimburse school districts 100 percent of the per-pupil costs the first year a student leaves the district to attend a charter school, then 25 percent for each of the next five years." then zero after that.

To all those who say that charters don't drain money from districts, care to explain that?

Common Sense
Oct 26, 2016 - 3:53PM
Re: Question 2

Care To Explain?
Point Made
"DESE is now prioritizing reimbursements to districts during the first year of a tuition increase (the 100 percent reimbursement tier of the 100/25/25/25/25/25 sequence). Districts due reimbursements for later tiers only receive funding as it’s available. For FY 2016 it appears as though funding will be close to sufficient for funding first-year reimbursements (DESE currently projects 95% reimbursement for year one increases), with little to nothing left over for later year reimbursements. This effectively shifts the formula in FY 2016 from 100/25/25/25/25/25 to 95/0/0/0/0/0."

Let's translate that to Melrose. If MV raises it's tuition $1000, in the first year Melrose will get most of that reimbursed. In the following years, Melrose will get none of it reimbursed, meaning a guaranteed additional shortfall of about $200,000.00 every year, and that's just for one $1000 tuition increase.


It isn't just tuition increases, it's ALL tuition. From the Free Press: "A 2010 law requires the state to reimburse school districts 100 percent of the per-pupil costs the first year a student leaves the district to attend a charter school, then 25 percent for each of the next five years." then zero after that.

To all those who say that charters don't drain money from districts, care to explain that?


The sending school has many years to demonstrate and convince the parents that they should come back to the school! Schools that don't care - won't make the effort! Has Melrose made any efforts to get back parents - I'll answer that one - based on continuing OCR violations and SPED issues - answer is a resounding NO!

And
Oct 26, 2016 - 3:54PM
Re: Question 2

According to all the most recent articles, the first year the State is only reimbursing at 63% because it doesn't have enough $$$$. Expected to get much worse. The article is linked on this thread on page 2 or 3.

Can't compete
Oct 26, 2016 - 3:57PM
Re: Question 2

Common Sense
Care To Explain?
Point Made
"DESE is now prioritizing reimbursements to districts during the first year of a tuition increase (the 100 percent reimbursement tier of the 100/25/25/25/25/25 sequence). Districts due reimbursements for later tiers only receive funding as it’s available. For FY 2016 it appears as though funding will be close to sufficient for funding first-year reimbursements (DESE currently projects 95% reimbursement for year one increases), with little to nothing left over for later year reimbursements. This effectively shifts the formula in FY 2016 from 100/25/25/25/25/25 to 95/0/0/0/0/0."

Let's translate that to Melrose. If MV raises it's tuition $1000, in the first year Melrose will get most of that reimbursed. In the following years, Melrose will get none of it reimbursed, meaning a guaranteed additional shortfall of about $200,000.00 every year, and that's just for one $1000 tuition increase.


It isn't just tuition increases, it's ALL tuition. From the Free Press: "A 2010 law requires the state to reimburse school districts 100 percent of the per-pupil costs the first year a student leaves the district to attend a charter school, then 25 percent for each of the next five years." then zero after that.

To all those who say that charters don't drain money from districts, care to explain that?


The sending school has many years to demonstrate and convince the parents that they should come back to the school! Schools that don't care - won't make the effort! Has Melrose made any efforts to get back parents - I'll answer that one - based on continuing OCR violations and SPED issues - answer is a resounding NO!


If families are leaving for a longer school day, a longer school year, and bus transportation (because of two working parents) there is not much the sending district can do.

often
Oct 26, 2016 - 4:00PM
Re: Question 2

Voted Often!
...like a Hillary supporter




Voting early will help Hillary sadly. The bit$$ shouldn't even be 40 percent. Don't forget who got killed at war because of her. A neighbor military man from Winchester. If that was your son or daughter you would not be voting for her or her hubby.















Not Surprised
Oct 26, 2016 - 5:04PM
Re: Question 2

Care To Explain?
Point Made
"DESE is now prioritizing reimbursements to districts during the first year of a tuition increase (the 100 percent reimbursement tier of the 100/25/25/25/25/25 sequence). Districts due reimbursements for later tiers only receive funding as it’s available. For FY 2016 it appears as though funding will be close to sufficient for funding first-year reimbursements (DESE currently projects 95% reimbursement for year one increases), with little to nothing left over for later year reimbursements. This effectively shifts the formula in FY 2016 from 100/25/25/25/25/25 to 95/0/0/0/0/0."

Let's translate that to Melrose. If MV raises it's tuition $1000, in the first year Melrose will get most of that reimbursed. In the following years, Melrose will get none of it reimbursed, meaning a guaranteed additional shortfall of about $200,000.00 every year, and that's just for one $1000 tuition increase.


It isn't just tuition increases, it's ALL tuition. From the Free Press: "A 2010 law requires the state to reimburse school districts 100 percent of the per-pupil costs the first year a student leaves the district to attend a charter school, then 25 percent for each of the next five years." then zero after that.

To all those who say that charters don't drain money from districts, care to explain that?


I thought not. Interesting that when confronted with facts about what is a statewide issue, the vote yes folks never seem to respond to facts that do not fit their agenda. Instead the point out how bad the Melrose schools are, as if that's even relevant somehow.

The Melrose schools are a disgrace. That's a fact and it's a shame, but that has very little to do with this issue. No more Melrose kids can opt for a charter. We are capped. Except for tuition increases, we will not be paying any more to MV, but we will lose a tremendous amount of money overall thanks to the state's broken reimbursement promises, and our state tax dollars will be used to reimburse those towns where the new charters are placed. The bottom line is we will be losing even more money in both local and state taxes even though we cannot place any more charter students.

Voting no.

Hillary
Oct 29, 2016 - 10:00AM
Re: Question 2

often
Voted Often!
...like a Hillary supporter




Voting early will help Hillary sadly. The bit$$ shouldn't even be 40 percent. Don't forget who got killed at war because of her. A neighbor military man from Winchester. If that was your son or daughter you would not be voting for her or her hubby.



Hillary received 600 hundred phone calls on what was happening to our men and women and she only answer one...


















book
Oct 31, 2016 - 4:51PM
Re: Question 2

Hillary
often
Voted Often!
...like a Hillary supporter




Voting early will help Hillary sadly. The bit$$ shouldn't even be 40 percent. Don't forget who got killed at war because of her. A neighbor military man from Winchester. If that was your son or daughter you would not be voting for her or her hubby.



Hillary received 600 hundred phone calls on what was happening to our men and women and she only answer one...



Read the book Guilty As Sin, it starts with Bill Clinton. Tells how Hillary would step over her child, mother, father, lover, and grandmother to get to the oval office. All the Democrats crying about the FBI coming out with more evidence on Hillary. Like the post said 600 hundred phone calls to say we are under attack. Hillary answered only one person. If elected her 4 year term will be all legal troubles. Other countries will start black mailing her to get what they want. It will be worse then Obama's, and that was bad. The little brain was thinking, and not the big brain Weiner. If I had did early voting I would want to vote again after hearing about this heartless ***** Hillary. Who would ever think we would be thanking this sex offender. Leave it to the stupid Dems.


















voting
Oct 31, 2016 - 5:42PM
Re: Question 2

I am so glad I did'nt do early voting. I was never going to vote for crooked Hillary

anyways, but I know people are mad they voted early. They would like to change their votes

at this time. The new evidence mounting up on Hillary, I would want to vote again. The way

teachers are such bullies to the staff, what are they like to the students? Voting yes,

yes, yes, and yes.

Pro Charter
Feb 18, 2017 - 11:24AM
Re: Question 2

Big mistake here not voting for the charter schools.

1 2 3
Return to Website  > Index  > Melrose Cares: A Community Dialogue  > Schools & School Committee  > Re: Question 2