Schools & School Committee
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: SC packet

and next week, water and sewer

Re: SC packet

Dillon
Google for Dummies - Get the Book
Another violation
No agenda packet listed for this Tuesday's school committee meeting meeting yet again. Supposed to be posted by yesterday, Friday.


http://melrosecityma.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=14&ID=2917&Inline=True

Took me two seconds to find. Learn how to search before posting inaccurate statements.


Dear Google for Dummies poster,

The only dummy here is you. I just checked the SC website under IQM2. The agenda is listed as was stated previously; however, the packet was not just as the above person stated. I think you can open your mouth and insert your foot now dick head.

Sincerely,
Someone who's actually opened a book and read it.
The school committee meeting wasn't posted on the city calendar. It was held illegally, just like the last one.

Re: SC packet

Yes, another OML violation. You'll have to line up with all the others. The Secretary of State's office has the City Solicitor's office on speed dial and has probably hired an attorney just to deal with the all the Melrose violations. Lets face it; its a full time job.

Re: SC packet

President Trump, will fire a staffer not lite CT, Dolan, and SC. That is the differents between the two.

Re: SC packet

PARAS ?
Why do the MPS need so many PARAS?....are the teachers unqualified/unable to handle their students/classrooms?....Are the kids so stressed by their stressed teachers? The poor teachers are treated {bullied} by Cyndy and company) MPS admins treat their staffs the way Trump treats his "inner circle"


Really. Are you that big of an idiot? The amount of paras employed are driven by IEPs. There are not just educational needs but behavioral, safety. These children are entitled to the best serves or at least equal to typical students. The good paras watch out and assist the typical children too. Most teachers appreciate good paras. I'd say 80-90% are excellent. Most paras have degrees, are well educated, former teachers. All take professional development throughout the year every year. Gone are the days of teachers aids though some teachers still treat paras that way. Better odds than the newbie, entitled, last in their class teacher hires over the past five years. The decent teachers appreciates the work the paras do. What the teachers aren't doing is stepping forward and backing the paras like the paras have for them. We are all MTA. But then the MTA hasn't shown there face the past year or so. It's a sad state in mps.

Re: SC packet

The IEP's student are not getting the equal time with their para. Reason is the paras are pulled for the day to sub., lunch duty, outside duty or an emergency. The average student then misses the teachers teaching time cause the teacher is helping a special needs student. Ms. Cyndy Paymore will not hire enough paras. The poster is correct what is wrong with the MTA?

Re: SC packet

not true
The IEP's student are not getting the equal time with their para. Reason is the paras are pulled for the day to sub., lunch duty, outside duty or an emergency. The average student then misses the teachers teaching time cause the teacher is helping a special needs student. Ms. Cyndy Paymore will not hire enough paras. The poster is correct what is wrong with the MTA?[/quote

It is not the paras fault they are being pulled. I agree we need to hire floater paras to sub for absent paras, teachers when they need to go to a meeting or absent. Funny when a para is absent they try and get coverage because the teacher can't do it alone. When a teacher is absent the para does both jobs. The system is messed up and that fall on administration. A good teacher will speak up when they try to pull her para but most don't. Paras are forbidden to speak to parents. That's why no paras names ate listed anywhere. Afraid the truth will come out from the good paras who care the IEPs. a binding contract, is being violated.

Re: SC packet

So was CT's contract renewed or a pot of money distributed to they won't tell us who and how much?